The second bias builds on the first as the group seem to hit common ground as terminology and focal points also seem to converge, and an element of groupthink emerges, and thus the selective information treatment bias takes effect, hearing all the right words, but taking their meanings to mean your view as to a solution. The PRS solution through this document is just not questioned to any combative degree and it makes one wonder who’s paying for the post discussion jolly down the local pub and curry house (of course I jest).

I must emphasise we are all subject to this, but to be aware and question one’s own biases is a constant for all researchers searching for some truths.